Sign In
Pricing

440323 (Harmonized System 2017 for 6-digit)

2022
World Trade $2.93BRnk 1215 / 5380
2022
Top Exporter | Top Importer $831M | $803MGermany | China
2022
Product Complexity 0.98Rnk 932 / 5381
2021 - 2022
Export Growth (CAGR) -19.4%Rnk 4997 / 5380
2022
Share of World Trade 0.012%Rnk 1215 / 5380

About

Overview This page contains the latest trade data of Wood; coniferous species, of fir (Abies spp.) and spruce (Picea spp.), in the rough, whether or not stripped of bark or sapwood, or roughly squared, untreated, of which any cross-sectional dimension is 15 cm or more. In 2022, Wood; coniferous species, of fir (Abies spp.) and spruce (Picea spp.), in the rough, whether or not stripped of bark or sapwood, or roughly squared, untreated, of which any cross-sectional dimension is 15 cm or more were the world's 1215th most traded product, with a total trade of $2.93B. Between 2021 and 2022 the exports of Wood; coniferous species, of fir (Abies spp.) and spruce (Picea spp.), in the rough, whether or not stripped of bark or sapwood, or roughly squared, untreated, of which any cross-sectional dimension is 15 cm or more decreased by -19.4%, from $3.64B to $2.93B. Trade in Wood; coniferous species, of fir (Abies spp.) and spruce (Picea spp.), in the rough, whether or not stripped of bark or sapwood, or roughly squared, untreated, of which any cross-sectional dimension is 15 cm or more represent 0.012% of total world trade.

Wood; coniferous species, of fir (Abies spp.) and spruce (Picea spp.), in the rough, whether or not stripped of bark or sapwood, or roughly squared, untreated, of which any cross-sectional dimension is 15 cm or more are a part of Wood in the rough, whether or not stripped of bark or sapwood,....

Exports In 2022 the top exporters of Wood; coniferous species, of fir (Abies spp.) and spruce (Picea spp.), in the rough, whether or not stripped of bark or sapwood, or roughly squared, untreated, of which any cross-sectional dimension is 15 cm or more  were Germany ($831M), Czechia ($801M), United States ($156M), Norway ($156M), and Netherlands ($147M).

Imports In 2022 the top importers of Wood; coniferous species, of fir (Abies spp.) and spruce (Picea spp.), in the rough, whether or not stripped of bark or sapwood, or roughly squared, untreated, of which any cross-sectional dimension is 15 cm or more were China ($803M), Austria ($598M), Germany ($316M), Poland ($147M), and Romania ($115M).

Ranking Wood; coniferous species, of fir (Abies spp.) and spruce (Picea spp.), in the rough, whether or not stripped of bark or sapwood, or roughly squared, untreated, of which any cross-sectional dimension is 15 cm or more ranks 932nd in the Product Complexity Index (PCI).

Latest Trends

Latest Data

View
Flow
Y-AXIS SCALE

The following visualization shows the latest trends on Wood; coniferous species, of fir (Abies spp.) and spruce (Picea spp.), in the rough, whether or not stripped of bark or sapwood, or roughly squared, untreated, of which any cross-sectional dimension is 15 cm or more. Countries are shown based on data availability.

For a full breakdown of trade patterns, visit the trend explorer or the product in country profile.

Explore Latest Trends

* Trade values are converted to USD using each month's exchange rate. For December 2023 data, the exchange rate from December 30, 2023 is used.

Subscribe today to OEC pro and access the latest data

Sign Up

Historical Data

Exporters and Importers

Top Origin (2022)Germany$831M
Top Destination (2022)China$803M

In 2022 Wood; coniferous species, of fir (Abies spp.) and spruce (Picea spp.), in the rough, whether or not stripped of bark or sapwood, or roughly squared, untreated, of which any cross-sectional dimension is 15 cm or more were the world's 1215th most traded product (out of 5,380).

In 2022, the top exporters of Wood; coniferous species, of fir (Abies spp.) and spruce (Picea spp.), in the rough, whether or not stripped of bark or sapwood, or roughly squared, untreated, of which any cross-sectional dimension is 15 cm or more were Germany ($831M), Czechia ($801M), United States ($156M), Norway ($156M), and Netherlands ($147M).

In 2022, the top importers of Wood; coniferous species, of fir (Abies spp.) and spruce (Picea spp.), in the rough, whether or not stripped of bark or sapwood, or roughly squared, untreated, of which any cross-sectional dimension is 15 cm or more were China ($803M), Austria ($598M), Germany ($316M), Poland ($147M), and Romania ($115M).

Explore Visualizations

Exporters of Wood; coniferous species, of fir (Abies spp.) and spruce (Picea spp.), in the rough, whether or not stripped of bark or sapwood, or roughly squared, untreated, of which any cross-sectional dimension is 15 cm or more (2022)
[Click to Select a Country]

Importers of Wood; coniferous species, of fir (Abies spp.) and spruce (Picea spp.), in the rough, whether or not stripped of bark or sapwood, or roughly squared, untreated, of which any cross-sectional dimension is 15 cm or more (2022)
[Click to Select a Country]

Market Dynamics

Color
Top Origin Growth (2021 -  2022)Sweden$44.2M
Top Destination Growth (2021 -  2022)Czechia$14M

Between 2021 and 2022, the exports of Wood; coniferous species, of fir (Abies spp.) and spruce (Picea spp.), in the rough, whether or not stripped of bark or sapwood, or roughly squared, untreated, of which any cross-sectional dimension is 15 cm or more grew the fastest in Sweden ($44.2M), Norway ($24.5M), Latvia ($17.1M), Austria ($9.37M), and Estonia ($9.13M).

Between 2021 and 2022, the fastest growing importers of Wood; coniferous species, of fir (Abies spp.) and spruce (Picea spp.), in the rough, whether or not stripped of bark or sapwood, or roughly squared, untreated, of which any cross-sectional dimension is 15 cm or more were Czechia ($14M), Latvia ($13.5M), France ($12.6M), Germany ($10.8M), and Luxembourg ($9.84M).

Explore Visualizations

Exporters of Wood; coniferous species, of fir (Abies spp.) and spruce (Picea spp.), in the rough, whether or not stripped of bark or sapwood, or roughly squared, untreated, of which any cross-sectional dimension is 15 cm or more (2021 - 2022)

Importers of Wood; coniferous species, of fir (Abies spp.) and spruce (Picea spp.), in the rough, whether or not stripped of bark or sapwood, or roughly squared, untreated, of which any cross-sectional dimension is 15 cm or more (2021 - 2022)

Market Concentration

Value

This chart shows the evolution of the market concentration of exports of Wood; coniferous species, of fir (Abies spp.) and spruce (Picea spp.), in the rough, whether or not stripped of bark or sapwood, or roughly squared, untreated, of which any cross-sectional dimension is 15 cm or more.

In 2022, market concentration measured using Shannon Entropy, was 3.41. This means that most of the exports of Wood; coniferous species, of fir (Abies spp.) and spruce (Picea spp.), in the rough, whether or not stripped of bark or sapwood, or roughly squared, untreated, of which any cross-sectional dimension is 15 cm or more are explained by 10 countries.

Explore Visualizations

Value of Exports in Wood; coniferous species, of fir (Abies spp.) and spruce (Picea spp.), in the rough, whether or not stripped of bark or sapwood, or roughly squared, untreated, of which any cross-sectional dimension is 15 cm or more

Net Trade

TOP NET EXPORTER (2022)Czechia$734M
TOP NET IMPORTER (2022)China$803M

This map shows which countries export or import more of Wood; coniferous species, of fir (Abies spp.) and spruce (Picea spp.), in the rough, whether or not stripped of bark or sapwood, or roughly squared, untreated, of which any cross-sectional dimension is 15 cm or more. Each country is colored based on the difference in exports and imports of Wood; coniferous species, of fir (Abies spp.) and spruce (Picea spp.), in the rough, whether or not stripped of bark or sapwood, or roughly squared, untreated, of which any cross-sectional dimension is 15 cm or more during 2022.

In 2022, the countries that had a largest trade value in exports than in imports of Wood; coniferous species, of fir (Abies spp.) and spruce (Picea spp.), in the rough, whether or not stripped of bark or sapwood, or roughly squared, untreated, of which any cross-sectional dimension is 15 cm or more were Czechia ($734M), Germany ($515M), Norway ($140M), Netherlands ($133M), and United States ($133M).

In 2022, the countries that had a largest trade value in imports than in exports of Wood; coniferous species, of fir (Abies spp.) and spruce (Picea spp.), in the rough, whether or not stripped of bark or sapwood, or roughly squared, untreated, of which any cross-sectional dimension is 15 cm or more were China ($803M), Austria ($531M), Romania ($112M), Poland ($71.5M), and Slovakia ($67.2M).

Net Trade (2022)

Country Comparison

Flow
Measure
Ranking

This visualization shows the countries that have an important ratio of their trade related to Wood; coniferous species, of fir (Abies spp.) and spruce (Picea spp.), in the rough, whether or not stripped of bark or sapwood, or roughly squared, untreated, of which any cross-sectional dimension is 15 cm or more.
It is possible to select the main countries that export or import Wood; coniferous species, of fir (Abies spp.) and spruce (Picea spp.), in the rough, whether or not stripped of bark or sapwood, or roughly squared, untreated, of which any cross-sectional dimension is 15 cm or more in the world, or by continent, as well as select the measure of interest.

Top 10 Exporters Countries of Wood; coniferous species, of fir (Abies spp.) and spruce (Picea spp.), in the rough, whether or not stripped of bark or sapwood, or roughly squared, untreated, of which any cross-sectional dimension is 15 cm or more by percentage of total exports

Product Complexity

Diversification Frontier

Specialization

The Complexity-Relatedness diagram compares the risk and the strategic value of a product's potential export opportunities. Relatedness is predictive of the probability that a country increases its exports in a product. Complexity, is associated with higher levels of income, economic growth potential, lower income inequality, and lower emissions.

Relatedness vs Country Complexity (2022)

Keep Exploring

Have questions, comments, or concerns?
Send us an e-mail: support@oec.world
Follow @OECtoday on
Created, Designed, and Developed by:
In collaboration with
About the OECPrivacy PolicyTerms