852421 (Harmonized System 1992 for 6-digit)

About

Overview This page contains the latest trade data of Recorded magnetic tapes, width < 4 mm. In 2018, Recorded magnetic tapes, width < 4 mm were the world's 4795th most traded product, with a total trade of $79. Between 2017 and 2018 the exports of Recorded magnetic tapes, width < 4 mm decreased by -93.9%, from $1.29k to $79. Trade in Recorded magnetic tapes, width < 4 mm represent 4.2e-10% of total world trade.

Recorded magnetic tapes, width < 4 mm are a part of Sound Recordings.

Exports In 2018 the top exporters of Recorded magnetic tapes, width < 4 mm  were China ($54), United States ($23), and United Kingdom ($2).

Imports In 2018 the top importers of Recorded magnetic tapes, width < 4 mm were Barbados ($79).

Ranking Recorded magnetic tapes, width < 4 mm ranks 107th in the Product Complexity Index (PCI).

Latest Data

View
Flow
Y-AXIS SCALE

The following visualization shows the latest trends on Recorded magnetic tapes, width < 4 mm. Countries are shown based on data availability.

For a full breakdown of trade patterns, visit the trend explorer or the product in country profile.

Explore Latest Trends

* Trade values are converted to USD using each month's exchange rate. For December 2023 data, the exchange rate from December 30, 2023 is used.

Subscribe today to OEC pro and access the latest data

Sign Up

Historical Data

Exporters and Importers

Top Origin (2018)China$54
Top Destination (2018)Barbados$79

In 2018 Recorded magnetic tapes, width < 4 mm were the world's 4795th most traded product (out of 4,807).

In 2018, the top exporters of Recorded magnetic tapes, width < 4 mm were China ($54), United States ($23), and United Kingdom ($2).

In 2018, the top importers of Recorded magnetic tapes, width < 4 mm were Barbados ($79).

Explore Visualizations

Exporters of Recorded magnetic tapes, width < 4 mm (2018)
[Click to Select a Country]

Importers of Recorded magnetic tapes, width < 4 mm (2018)
[Click to Select a Country]

Market Dynamics

Color

Explore Visualizations

Exporters of Recorded magnetic tapes, width < 4 mm (2017 - 2018)

Importers of Recorded magnetic tapes, width < 4 mm (2017 - 2018)

Market Concentration

Value

This chart shows the evolution of the market concentration of exports of Recorded magnetic tapes, width < 4 mm.

In 2018, market concentration measured using Shannon Entropy, was 1.03. This means that most of the exports of Recorded magnetic tapes, width < 4 mm are explained by 2 countries.

Explore Visualizations

Value of Exports in Recorded magnetic tapes, width < 4 mm

Net Trade

TOP NET EXPORTER (2018)China$54
TOP NET IMPORTER (2018)United Kingdom$2

This map shows which countries export or import more of Recorded magnetic tapes, width < 4 mm. Each country is colored based on the difference in exports and imports of Recorded magnetic tapes, width < 4 mm during 2018.

In 2018, the countries that had a largest trade value in exports than in imports of Recorded magnetic tapes, width < 4 mm were China ($54), United States ($23), and United Kingdom ($2).

Net Trade (2018)

Country Comparison

Flow
Measure
Ranking

This visualization shows the countries that have an important ratio of their trade related to Recorded magnetic tapes, width < 4 mm.
It is possible to select the main countries that export or import Recorded magnetic tapes, width < 4 mm in the world, or by continent, as well as select the measure of interest.

Top 10 Exporters Countries of Recorded magnetic tapes, width < 4 mm by percentage of total exports

Product Complexity

Diversification Frontier

Specialization

The Complexity-Relatedness diagram compares the risk and the strategic value of a product's potential export opportunities. Relatedness is predictive of the probability that a country increases its exports in a product. Complexity, is associated with higher levels of income, economic growth potential, lower income inequality, and lower emissions.

Relatedness vs Country Complexity (2018)

Have questions, comments, or concerns?
Send us an e-mail: support@oec.world
Follow @OECtoday on
Created, Designed, and Developed by:
In collaboration with