2022
Flag  
GDP
$70.3BCURRENT US$
Rnk 81 / 186
2012-2022
Flag
GDP GROWTH
63.8%CURRENT US$
Rnk 38 / 186
2022
Flag
 GDP
$30BCURRENT US$
Rnk 103 / 186
2012-2022
Flag
GDP GROWTH
113%CURRENT US$
Rnk 10 / 186
2022
Flag
GDP PC 
$24,827CURRENT US$
Rnk 45 / 186
2012-2022
Flag
GDP PC GROWTH
72.8%CURRENT US$
Rnk 17 / 186
2022
Flag
GDP PC
$1,787CURRENT US$
Rnk 150 / 186
2012-2022
Flag
GDP PC GROWTH
88%CURRENT US$
Rnk 12 / 186

About

Lithuania-Cambodia In 2022, Lithuania exported $1.85M to Cambodia. The main products that Lithuania exported to Cambodia are Animal Organs ($536k), Rough Wood ($357k), and Whey and other milk products ($205k). During the last 23 years the exports of Lithuania to Cambodia have increased at an annualized rate of 40.9%, from $694 in 1999 to $1.85M in 2022.

In 2022, Lithuania did not export any services to Cambodia.

Cambodia-Lithuania In 2022, Cambodia exported $1.76M to Lithuania. The main products that Cambodia exported to Lithuania were Rice ($697k), Electrical Transformers ($633k), and Textile Footwear ($124k). During the last 23 years the exports of Cambodia to Lithuania have increased at an annualized rate of 12.6%, from $115k in 1999 to $1.76M in 2022.

In 2022, Cambodia did not export any services to Lithuania.

Comparison In 2022,  Lithuania ranked 30 in the Economic Complexity Index (ECI 0.93), and 62 in total exports ($46.9B). That same year, Cambodia ranked 92 in the Economic Complexity Index (ECI -0.6), and 69 in total exports ($35.9B).

Historical Data

Bilateral Trade by Products

Depth
Value

In 2022, Lithuania exported $1.85M to Cambodia. The main products exported from Lithuania to Cambodia were Animal Organs ($536k), Rough Wood ($357k), and Whey and other milk products ($205k). During the last 23 years the exports of Lithuania to Cambodia have increased at an annualized rate of 40.9%, from $694 in 1999 to $1.85M in 2022.

In 2022, Cambodia exported $1.76M to Lithuania. The main products exported from Cambodia to Lithuania were Rice ($697k), Electrical Transformers ($633k), and Textile Footwear ($124k). During the last 22 years the exports of Cambodia to Lithuania have increased at an annualized rate of 12.6%, from $115k in 2000 to $1.76M in 2022.

Exports from Lithuania (Flag) to Cambodia (Flag) (2022)

Exports from Cambodia (Flag) to Lithuania (Flag) (2022)

Latest Data

Trade between Lithuania (Flag) and Cambodia (Flag)

Lithuania Exports

Market Competitiveness

Color
Lithuania
Top Destination
Latvia$6.18B
Cambodia
Top Destination
United States$13B

This map shows whether countries import more from Lithuania or Cambodia. Each country is colored based on the difference in imports they receive from Lithuania and Cambodia or the difference in the growth in imports.

In 2021, countries that imported more from Lithuania than Cambodia were Latvia ($6.18B), Poland ($3.91B), and Russia ($2.88B).

In 2021, countries that imported more from Cambodia than Lithuania were United States ($13B), Vietnam ($3.67B), and Japan ($1.92B).

Difference in imports from Cambodia (Flag) and Lithuania (Flag) (2022)

Comparative Advantage Lithuania - Cambodia

Flow
Scale

This chart compares trade between Lithuania and Cambodia by product, considering products traded by both, Lithuania and Cambodia.

During 2022, Lithuania had a large net trade with Cambodia in the exports of Animal Products ($740k), Wood Products ($357k), and Machines ($259k).

During 2022, Cambodia had a large net trade with Lithuania in the exports of Vegetable Products ($729k), Machines ($675k), and Textiles ($191k).

Economic Complexity

Competitive Landscape

This visualization show the product space at the HS4 level colored from blue to yellow.  This mean that the more blue a dot/product is, the more Lithuania has comparative advantage over Cambodia. Similarly, the more yellow a dot/product is, the more Cambodia has comparative advantage over Lithuania.

Product Space of Lithuania (Flag) and Cambodia (Flag) (2022)

Have questions, comments, or concerns?
Send us an e-mail: [email protected]
Follow @OECtoday on
Created, Designed, and Developed by:
In collaboration with