2022
Flag  
GDP
$27.8BCURRENT US$
Rnk 107 / 186
2012-2022
Flag
GDP GROWTH
88.7%CURRENT US$
Rnk 20 / 186
2022
Flag
 GDP
$95BCURRENT US$
Rnk 68 / 186
2012-2022
Flag
GDP GROWTH
91.6%CURRENT US$
Rnk 17 / 186
2022
Flag
GDP PC 
$72,903CURRENT US$
Rnk 9 / 186
2012-2022
Flag
GDP PC GROWTH
58.5%CURRENT US$
Rnk 29 / 186
2022
Flag
GDP PC
$5,473CURRENT US$
Rnk 107 / 186
2012-2022
Flag
GDP PC GROWTH
63.1%CURRENT US$
Rnk 22 / 186

About

Iceland-Guatemala Trade: In 2022, Iceland exported $217k to Guatemala. The main products that Iceland exported to Guatemala were Valves ($172k), Fish oil ($18.1k), and Non-fillet Fresh Fish ($14k). Over the past 5 years the exports of Iceland to Guatemala have increased at an annualized rate of 32.6%, from $52.9k in 2017 to $217k in 2022.

In 2022, Iceland did not export any services to Guatemala.

Guatemala-Iceland Trade: In 2022, Guatemala exported $457k to Iceland. The main products that Guatemala exported to Iceland were Coffee ($83.9k), Legumes ($69k), and Bananas ($49.7k). Over the past 5 years the exports of Guatemala to Iceland have decreased at an annualized rate of 12.7%,  from $901k in 2017 to $457k in 2022.

In 2022, Guatemala did not export any services to Iceland.

Comparison In 2022,  Iceland ranked 116 in total exports ($7.31B), and does not have data regarding Economic Complexity Index. That same year, Guatemala ranked 76 in the Economic Complexity Index (ECI -0.2), and 84 in total exports ($16.4B).

Historical Data

Bilateral Trade by Products

Depth
Value

In 2022, Iceland exported $217k to Guatemala. The main products exported from Iceland to Guatemala were Valves ($172k), Fish oil ($18.1k), and Non-fillet Fresh Fish ($14k). During the last 5 years the exports of Iceland to Guatemala have increased at an annualized rate of 32.6%, from $52.9k in 2017 to $217k in 2022.

In 2017, Guatemala exported $457k to Iceland. The main products exported from Guatemala to Iceland were Coffee ($83.9k), Legumes ($69k), and Bananas ($49.7k). During the last 5 years the exports of Guatemala to Iceland have decreased at an annualized rate of 12.7%, from $901k in 2022 to $457k in 2017.

Exports from Iceland (Flag) to Guatemala (Flag) (2022)

Exports from Guatemala (Flag) to Iceland (Flag) (2022)

Latest Data

Trade between Iceland (Flag) and Guatemala (Flag)

Iceland Exports

Guatemala Exports

Market Competitiveness

Color
Iceland
Top Destination
Netherlands$1.97B
Guatemala
Top Destination
United States$5.23B

This map shows whether countries import more from Iceland or Guatemala. Each country is colored based on the difference in imports they receive from Iceland and Guatemala or the difference in the growth in imports.

In 2022, countries that imported more from Iceland than Guatemala included Netherlands ($1.97B), United Kingdom ($672M), and Norway ($459M).

In 2022, countries that imported more from Guatemala than Iceland included United States ($5.23B), El Salvador ($2.03B), and Honduras ($1.58B).

Difference in imports from Guatemala (Flag) and Iceland (Flag) (2022)

Comparative Advantage Iceland - Guatemala

Flow
Scale

This chart compares trade between Iceland and Guatemala by product, considering products traded by both, Iceland and Guatemala.

During 2022, Iceland had a large net trade with Guatemala in the exports of Machines ($178k), Animal and Vegetable Bi-Products ($18.1k), and Animal Products ($14k).

During 2017, Guatemala had a large net trade with Iceland in the exports of Vegetable Products ($267k), Textiles ($117k), and Foodstuffs ($58.3k).

Economic Complexity

Competitive Landscape

This visualization shows the product space at the HS4 level with the flags of Iceland and Guatemala. This means that a dot/product with the flag of Iceland indicates it has a comparative advantage over Guatemala. Similarly, a dot/product with the flag of Guatemala indicates it has a comparative advantage over Iceland.

Product Space of Iceland (Flag) and Guatemala (Flag) (2022)

Have questions, comments, or concerns?
Send us an e-mail: support@oec.world
Follow @OECtoday on
Created, Designed, and Developed by:
In collaboration with