Sign In
Pricing

440325 (Harmonized System 2017 for 6-digit)

2022
World Trade $1.5BRnk 1874 / 5380
2022
Top Exporter | Top Importer $725M | $689MUnited States | Japan
2022
Product Complexity 0.65Rnk 1603 / 5381
2021 - 2022
Export Growth (CAGR) -6.83%Rnk 4357 / 5380
2022
Share of World Trade 0.0063%Rnk 1874 / 5380

About

Overview This page contains the latest trade data of Wood; coniferous species n.e.c in headings 4403.21 or 4403.23, in the rough, whether or not stripped of bark or sapwood, or roughly squared, untreated, of which any cross-sectional dimension is 15 cm or more. In 2022, Wood; coniferous species n.e.c in headings 4403.21 or 4403.23, in the rough, whether or not stripped of bark or sapwood, or roughly squared, untreated, of which any cross-sectional dimension is 15 cm or more were the world's 1874th most traded product, with a total trade of $1.5B. Between 2021 and 2022 the exports of Wood; coniferous species n.e.c in headings 4403.21 or 4403.23, in the rough, whether or not stripped of bark or sapwood, or roughly squared, untreated, of which any cross-sectional dimension is 15 cm or more decreased by -6.83%, from $1.61B to $1.5B. Trade in Wood; coniferous species n.e.c in headings 4403.21 or 4403.23, in the rough, whether or not stripped of bark or sapwood, or roughly squared, untreated, of which any cross-sectional dimension is 15 cm or more represent 0.0063% of total world trade.

Wood; coniferous species n.e.c in headings 4403.21 or 4403.23, in the rough, whether or not stripped of bark or sapwood, or roughly squared, untreated, of which any cross-sectional dimension is 15 cm or more are a part of Wood in the rough, whether or not stripped of bark or sapwood,....

Exports In 2022 the top exporters of Wood; coniferous species n.e.c in headings 4403.21 or 4403.23, in the rough, whether or not stripped of bark or sapwood, or roughly squared, untreated, of which any cross-sectional dimension is 15 cm or more  were United States ($725M), Canada ($363M), Japan ($129M), Czechia ($63M), and Germany ($61.6M).

Imports In 2022 the top importers of Wood; coniferous species n.e.c in headings 4403.21 or 4403.23, in the rough, whether or not stripped of bark or sapwood, or roughly squared, untreated, of which any cross-sectional dimension is 15 cm or more were Japan ($689M), China ($416M), South Korea ($68.5M), Canada ($55.8M), and Austria ($42.2M).

Ranking Wood; coniferous species n.e.c in headings 4403.21 or 4403.23, in the rough, whether or not stripped of bark or sapwood, or roughly squared, untreated, of which any cross-sectional dimension is 15 cm or more ranks 1603rd in the Product Complexity Index (PCI).

Latest Trends

Latest Data

View
Flow
Y-AXIS SCALE

The following visualization shows the latest trends on Wood; coniferous species n.e.c in headings 4403.21 or 4403.23, in the rough, whether or not stripped of bark or sapwood, or roughly squared, untreated, of which any cross-sectional dimension is 15 cm or more. Countries are shown based on data availability.

For a full breakdown of trade patterns, visit the trend explorer or the product in country profile.

Explore Latest Trends

* Trade values are converted to USD using each month's exchange rate. For December 2023 data, the exchange rate from December 30, 2023 is used.

Subscribe today to OEC pro and access the latest data

Sign Up

Historical Data

Exporters and Importers

Top Origin (2022)United States$725M
Top Destination (2022)Japan$689M

In 2022 Wood; coniferous species n.e.c in headings 4403.21 or 4403.23, in the rough, whether or not stripped of bark or sapwood, or roughly squared, untreated, of which any cross-sectional dimension is 15 cm or more were the world's 1874th most traded product (out of 5,380).

In 2022, the top exporters of Wood; coniferous species n.e.c in headings 4403.21 or 4403.23, in the rough, whether or not stripped of bark or sapwood, or roughly squared, untreated, of which any cross-sectional dimension is 15 cm or more were United States ($725M), Canada ($363M), Japan ($129M), Czechia ($63M), and Germany ($61.6M).

In 2022, the top importers of Wood; coniferous species n.e.c in headings 4403.21 or 4403.23, in the rough, whether or not stripped of bark or sapwood, or roughly squared, untreated, of which any cross-sectional dimension is 15 cm or more were Japan ($689M), China ($416M), South Korea ($68.5M), Canada ($55.8M), and Austria ($42.2M).

Explore Visualizations

Exporters of Wood; coniferous species n.e.c in headings 4403.21 or 4403.23, in the rough, whether or not stripped of bark or sapwood, or roughly squared, untreated, of which any cross-sectional dimension is 15 cm or more (2022)
[Click to Select a Country]

Importers of Wood; coniferous species n.e.c in headings 4403.21 or 4403.23, in the rough, whether or not stripped of bark or sapwood, or roughly squared, untreated, of which any cross-sectional dimension is 15 cm or more (2022)
[Click to Select a Country]

Market Dynamics

Color
Top Origin Growth (2021 -  2022)Poland$14.2M
Top Destination Growth (2021 -  2022)Japan$96.6M

Between 2021 and 2022, the exports of Wood; coniferous species n.e.c in headings 4403.21 or 4403.23, in the rough, whether or not stripped of bark or sapwood, or roughly squared, untreated, of which any cross-sectional dimension is 15 cm or more grew the fastest in Poland ($14.2M), United States ($11.1M), Sweden ($4.68M), Latvia ($4.59M), and Netherlands ($4.28M).

Between 2021 and 2022, the fastest growing importers of Wood; coniferous species n.e.c in headings 4403.21 or 4403.23, in the rough, whether or not stripped of bark or sapwood, or roughly squared, untreated, of which any cross-sectional dimension is 15 cm or more were Japan ($96.6M), Latvia ($7.92M), Canada ($5.82M), Chinese Taipei ($5.25M), and Poland ($5.05M).

Explore Visualizations

Exporters of Wood; coniferous species n.e.c in headings 4403.21 or 4403.23, in the rough, whether or not stripped of bark or sapwood, or roughly squared, untreated, of which any cross-sectional dimension is 15 cm or more (2021 - 2022)

Importers of Wood; coniferous species n.e.c in headings 4403.21 or 4403.23, in the rough, whether or not stripped of bark or sapwood, or roughly squared, untreated, of which any cross-sectional dimension is 15 cm or more (2021 - 2022)

Market Concentration

Value

This chart shows the evolution of the market concentration of exports of Wood; coniferous species n.e.c in headings 4403.21 or 4403.23, in the rough, whether or not stripped of bark or sapwood, or roughly squared, untreated, of which any cross-sectional dimension is 15 cm or more.

In 2022, market concentration measured using Shannon Entropy, was 2.5. This means that most of the exports of Wood; coniferous species n.e.c in headings 4403.21 or 4403.23, in the rough, whether or not stripped of bark or sapwood, or roughly squared, untreated, of which any cross-sectional dimension is 15 cm or more are explained by 5 countries.

Explore Visualizations

Value of Exports in Wood; coniferous species n.e.c in headings 4403.21 or 4403.23, in the rough, whether or not stripped of bark or sapwood, or roughly squared, untreated, of which any cross-sectional dimension is 15 cm or more

Net Trade

TOP NET EXPORTER (2022)United States$707M
TOP NET IMPORTER (2022)Japan$560M

This map shows which countries export or import more of Wood; coniferous species n.e.c in headings 4403.21 or 4403.23, in the rough, whether or not stripped of bark or sapwood, or roughly squared, untreated, of which any cross-sectional dimension is 15 cm or more. Each country is colored based on the difference in exports and imports of Wood; coniferous species n.e.c in headings 4403.21 or 4403.23, in the rough, whether or not stripped of bark or sapwood, or roughly squared, untreated, of which any cross-sectional dimension is 15 cm or more during 2022.

In 2022, the countries that had a largest trade value in exports than in imports of Wood; coniferous species n.e.c in headings 4403.21 or 4403.23, in the rough, whether or not stripped of bark or sapwood, or roughly squared, untreated, of which any cross-sectional dimension is 15 cm or more were United States ($707M), Canada ($307M), Czechia ($61.4M), Germany ($26.7M), and Sweden ($17.4M).

In 2022, the countries that had a largest trade value in imports than in exports of Wood; coniferous species n.e.c in headings 4403.21 or 4403.23, in the rough, whether or not stripped of bark or sapwood, or roughly squared, untreated, of which any cross-sectional dimension is 15 cm or more were Japan ($560M), China ($416M), South Korea ($68.5M), Austria ($32.1M), and Slovakia ($13.7M).

Net Trade (2022)

Country Comparison

Flow
Measure
Ranking

This visualization shows the countries that have an important ratio of their trade related to Wood; coniferous species n.e.c in headings 4403.21 or 4403.23, in the rough, whether or not stripped of bark or sapwood, or roughly squared, untreated, of which any cross-sectional dimension is 15 cm or more.
It is possible to select the main countries that export or import Wood; coniferous species n.e.c in headings 4403.21 or 4403.23, in the rough, whether or not stripped of bark or sapwood, or roughly squared, untreated, of which any cross-sectional dimension is 15 cm or more in the world, or by continent, as well as select the measure of interest.

Top 10 Exporters Countries of Wood; coniferous species n.e.c in headings 4403.21 or 4403.23, in the rough, whether or not stripped of bark or sapwood, or roughly squared, untreated, of which any cross-sectional dimension is 15 cm or more by percentage of total exports

Product Complexity

Diversification Frontier

Specialization

The Complexity-Relatedness diagram compares the risk and the strategic value of a product's potential export opportunities. Relatedness is predictive of the probability that a country increases its exports in a product. Complexity, is associated with higher levels of income, economic growth potential, lower income inequality, and lower emissions.

Relatedness vs Country Complexity (2022)

Keep Exploring

Have questions, comments, or concerns?
Send us an e-mail: support@oec.world
Follow @OECtoday on
Created, Designed, and Developed by:
In collaboration with
About the OECPrivacy PolicyTerms