Waste or scrap, aluminium760200 (Harmonized System 1992 for 6-digit)
World Trade (2018): $14.4B, Rnk 200 / 4726
Top Exporter (2018): $2.46B, United States
Top Importer (2018): $1.99B, India
Product Complexity (2018): -1.19, Rnk 2329 / 2722
Export Growth (CAGR)(2017 - 2018): 6.28%, Rnk 3181 / 4726
Mean Tariff (2018): 2.83%, Rnk 5819 / 6538
Share of World Trade (2018): 0.078%, Rnk 200 / 4726
Overview: This page contains the latest trade data of Waste or scrap, aluminium. In 2018, Waste or scrap, aluminium were the world's 200th most traded product, with a total trade of $14.4B. Between 2017 and 2018 the exports of Waste or scrap, aluminium grew by 6.28%, from $13.5B to $14.4B. Trade in Waste or scrap, aluminium represent 0.078% of total world trade.
Exports: In 2018 the top exporters of Waste or scrap, aluminium were United States ($2.46B), Germany ($1.65B), Canada ($892M), United Kingdom ($695M), and France ($602M).
Imports: In 2018 the top importers of Waste or scrap, aluminium were India ($1.99B), China ($1.89B), Germany ($1.26B), South Korea ($1.11B), and United States ($1.09B).
Tariffs: In 2018 the average tariff for Waste or scrap, aluminium was 2.83%, been the 5819 lowest tariff using the HS6 product classification.
The countries with the highest import tariffs for Waste or scrap, aluminium are Bahamas (40.2%), Bermuda (25%), Pakistan (16.1%), Tajikistan (13.1%), and Romania (12.9%). The countries with the lowest tariffs are Angola (0%), Kenya (0%), Mauritius (0%), Rwanda (0%), and Tanzania (0%).
Ranking: Waste or scrap, aluminium ranks 2329th in the Product Complexity Index (PCI).
Trade By Country
Top Origin (2018): United States, $2.46B
Top Destination (2018): India, $1.99B
Waste or scrap, aluminium are the world's 200th most traded product.
In 2018, the top exporters of Waste or scrap, aluminium were United States ($2.46B), Germany ($1.65B), Canada ($892M), United Kingdom ($695M), and France ($602M).
In 2018, the top importers of Waste or scrap, aluminium were India ($1.99B), China ($1.89B), Germany ($1.26B), South Korea ($1.11B), and United States ($1.09B).
Trade by country
Top Origin Growth (2017 - 2018): United States, $414M
Top Destination Growth (2017 - 2018): India, $316M
Between 2017 and 2018, the exports of Waste or scrap, aluminium grew the fastest in United States ($414M), United Arab Emirates ($105M), Canada ($103M), Chinese Taipei ($74.9M), and Mexico ($73.2M).
Between 2017 and 2018, the fastest growing importers of Waste or scrap, aluminium were India ($316M), Malaysia ($185M), Germany ($134M), Thailand ($117M), and Brazil ($105M).
Cumulative market share
This chart shows the evolution of the market concentration of exports of Waste or scrap, aluminium.
In 2018, market concentration measured using Shannon Entropy, was 5.07. This means that most of the exports of Waste or scrap, aluminium are explained by 33 countries.
TOP NET EXPORTER (2018): United States, $1.37B
TOP NET IMPORTER (2018): India, $1.98B
This map shows which countries export or import more of Waste or scrap, aluminium. Each country is colored based on the difference in exports and imports of Waste or scrap, aluminium during 2018.
In 2018, the countries that had a largest trade value in exports than in imports of Waste or scrap, aluminium were United States ($1.37B), Canada ($687M), United Kingdom ($547M), Australia ($419M), and Germany ($384M).
In 2018, the countries that had a largest trade value in imports than in exports of Waste or scrap, aluminium were India ($1.98B), China ($1.86B), South Korea ($1.09B), Italy ($638M), and Malaysia ($333M).
In 2018, the average tariff for importing Waste or scrap, aluminium was 2.83%. The countries with the highest tariffs for importing Waste or scrap, aluminium were Bahamas (40.2%), Bermuda (25%), Pakistan (16.1%), Tajikistan (13.1%), and Romania (12.9%).
The Complexity-Relatedness diagram compares the risk and the strategic value of a product's potential export opportunities. Relatedness is predictive of the probability that a country increases its exports in a product. Complexity, is associated with higher levels of income, economic growth potential, lower income inequality, and lower emissions.
Have questions, comments, or concerns?
Send us an e-mail: [email protected]
v4.0.2 ant