Petroleum coke, not calcined271311 (Harmonized System 1992 for 6-digit)
World Trade (2018): $6.03B, Rnk 539 / 4726
Top Exporter (2018): $3.34B, United States
Top Importer (2018): $1.08B, China
Product Complexity (2018): -1.2, Rnk 2332 / 2722
Export Growth (CAGR)(2017 - 2018): 24.7%, Rnk 1074 / 4726
Mean Tariff (2018): 2.71%, Rnk 5874 / 6538
Share of World Trade (2018): 0.033%, Rnk 539 / 4726
Overview: This page contains the latest trade data of Petroleum coke, not calcined. In 2018, Petroleum coke, not calcined were the world's 539th most traded product, with a total trade of $6.03B. Between 2017 and 2018 the exports of Petroleum coke, not calcined grew by 24.7%, from $4.83B to $6.03B. Trade in Petroleum coke, not calcined represent 0.033% of total world trade.
Exports: In 2018 the top exporters of Petroleum coke, not calcined were United States ($3.34B), Saudi Arabia ($447M), Spain ($314M), China ($251M), and Canada ($147M).
Imports: In 2018 the top importers of Petroleum coke, not calcined were China ($1.08B), India ($724M), Japan ($572M), Turkey ($412M), and Mexico ($370M).
Tariffs: In 2018 the average tariff for Petroleum coke, not calcined was 2.71%, been the 5874 lowest tariff using the HS6 product classification.
The countries with the highest import tariffs for Petroleum coke, not calcined are Turkmenistan (30%), Bermuda (25%), Sri Lanka (14.7%), Azerbaijan (14.4%), and Angola (10%). The countries with the lowest tariffs are Kenya (0%), Mauritius (0%), Rwanda (0%), Tanzania (0%), and Uganda (0%).
Ranking: Petroleum coke, not calcined ranks 2332nd in the Product Complexity Index (PCI).
Trade By Country
Top Origin (2018): United States, $3.34B
Top Destination (2018): China, $1.08B
Petroleum coke, not calcined are the world's 539th most traded product.
In 2018, the top exporters of Petroleum coke, not calcined were United States ($3.34B), Saudi Arabia ($447M), Spain ($314M), China ($251M), and Canada ($147M).
In 2018, the top importers of Petroleum coke, not calcined were China ($1.08B), India ($724M), Japan ($572M), Turkey ($412M), and Mexico ($370M).
Trade by country
Top Origin Growth (2017 - 2018): United States, $542M
Top Destination Growth (2017 - 2018): China, $397M
Between 2017 and 2018, the exports of Petroleum coke, not calcined grew the fastest in United States ($542M), Spain ($85M), China ($78.7M), Belgium-Luxembourg ($66.7M), and Kuwait ($50.2M).
Between 2017 and 2018, the fastest growing importers of Petroleum coke, not calcined were China ($397M), Japan ($102M), Mexico ($99.7M), Bahrain ($91M), and Turkey ($83.2M).
Cumulative market share
This chart shows the evolution of the market concentration of exports of Petroleum coke, not calcined.
In 2018, market concentration measured using Shannon Entropy, was 2.97. This means that most of the exports of Petroleum coke, not calcined are explained by 7 countries.
TOP NET EXPORTER (2018): United States, $3.16B
TOP NET IMPORTER (2018): China, $831M
This map shows which countries export or import more of Petroleum coke, not calcined. Each country is colored based on the difference in exports and imports of Petroleum coke, not calcined during 2018.
In 2018, the countries that had a largest trade value in exports than in imports of Petroleum coke, not calcined were United States ($3.16B), Saudi Arabia ($447M), Spain ($226M), Russia ($112M), and Chinese Taipei ($96.7M).
In 2018, the countries that had a largest trade value in imports than in exports of Petroleum coke, not calcined were China ($831M), India ($634M), Japan ($569M), Turkey ($380M), and Mexico ($368M).
In 2018, the average tariff for importing Petroleum coke, not calcined was 2.71%. The countries with the highest tariffs for importing Petroleum coke, not calcined were Turkmenistan (30%), Bermuda (25%), Sri Lanka (14.7%), Azerbaijan (14.4%), and Angola (10%).
The Complexity-Relatedness diagram compares the risk and the strategic value of a product's potential export opportunities. Relatedness is predictive of the probability that a country increases its exports in a product. Complexity, is associated with higher levels of income, economic growth potential, lower income inequality, and lower emissions.
Have questions, comments, or concerns?
Send us an e-mail: [email protected]
v4.0.2 ant