2023
Flag  
GDP
$1.71TCURRENT US$
Rnk 14 / 195
2013-2023
Flag
GDP GROWTH
25%CURRENT US$
Rnk 127 / 195
2023
Flag
 GDP
$12.1BCURRENT US$
Rnk 147 / 195
2013-2023
Flag
GDP GROWTH
42.8%CURRENT US$
Rnk 89 / 195
2023
Flag
GDP PC 
$33,121CURRENT US$
Rnk 41 / 195
2013-2023
Flag
GDP PC GROWTH
21.9%CURRENT US$
Rnk 99 / 195
2023
Flag
GDP PC
$1,161CURRENT US$
Rnk 175 / 196
2013-2023
Flag
GDP PC GROWTH
12.9%CURRENT US$
Rnk 125 / 195

About

South Korea-Tajikistan Trade: In 2022, South Korea exported $73.4M to Tajikistan. The main products that South Korea exported to Tajikistan were N/A. Over the past 5 years the exports of South Korea to Tajikistan have increased at an annualized rate of 30.4%, from $19.5M in 2017 to $73.4M in 2022.

In 2022, South Korea did not export any services to Tajikistan.

Tajikistan-South Korea Trade: In 2022, Tajikistan exported $361k to South Korea. The main products that Tajikistan exported to South Korea were N/A. Over the past 5 years the exports of Tajikistan to South Korea have decreased at an annualized rate of 43.9%,  from $6.47M in 2017 to $361k in 2022.

In 2022, Tajikistan did not export any services to South Korea.

Comparison: In 2023,  South Korea ranked 4 in the Economic Complexity Index (ECI 1.85), and 5 in total exports ($645B). That same year, Tajikistan ranked 106 in the Economic Complexity Index (ECI -0.89), and 153 in total exports ($1.49B).

Historical Data

Bilateral Trade by Products

Depth
Value

In 2022, South Korea exported $73.4M to Tajikistan. There were not main exports from South Korea to Tajikistan in 2022. During the last 5 years the exports of South Korea to Tajikistan have increased at an annualized rate of 30.4%, from $19.5M in 2017 to $73.4M in 2022.

In 2017, Tajikistan exported $361k to South Korea. There were not main exports from Tajikistan to South Korea in 2017. During the last 5 years the exports of Tajikistan to South Korea have decreased at an annualized rate of 43.9%, from $6.47M in 2022 to $361k in 2017.

Exports from South Korea (Flag) to Tajikistan (Flag) (2022)

Exports from Tajikistan (Flag) to South Korea (Flag) (2022)

Market Competitiveness

Color
South Korea
Top Destination
N/AN/A
Tajikistan
Top Destination
N/AN/A

This map shows whether countries import more from South Korea or Tajikistan. Each country is colored based on the difference in imports they receive from South Korea and Tajikistan or the difference in the growth in imports.

N/A

N/A

Difference in imports from Tajikistan (Flag) and South Korea (Flag) (2023)

Comparative Advantage South Korea - Tajikistan

Flow
Scale

This chart compares trade between South Korea and Tajikistan by product, considering products traded by both, South Korea and Tajikistan.

During 2022, South Korea had a large net trade with Tajikistan in the exports of .

During 2017, Tajikistan had a large net trade with South Korea in the exports of .

Potential Exports

Potential Exports

Depth
View
Sort By
Top Product Potential South Korea Tajikistan+$7.57MCars
Top Product Potential Tajikistan South Korea+$313kNon-Retail Pure Cotton Yarn

We estimate the export potential of an economy for each product and destination using an extension of the bilateral relatedness model of Jun et al. (2019).This extended gravity model considers similarities among products and geographies and explains more than 50% of the variance in future trade flows.

Subscribe today to OEC pro and access the latest data

Sign Up

Subscribe today to OEC pro and access the latest data

Sign Up

Economic Complexity

Competitive Landscape

This visualization shows the product space at the HS4 level with the flags of South Korea and Tajikistan. This means that a dot/product with the flag of South Korea indicates it has a comparative advantage over Tajikistan. Similarly, a dot/product with the flag of Tajikistan indicates it has a comparative advantage over South Korea.

Product Space of South Korea (Flag) and Tajikistan (Flag) (2022)

Have questions, comments, or concerns?
Send us an e-mail: support@oec.world
Follow @OECtoday on
Created, Designed, and Developed by:
In collaboration with